<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stallion WordPress Theme Layout/Design Options</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options</link>
	<description>The Best WordPress SEO Theme</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 20 May 2013 23:18:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-52058</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 May 2013 09:52:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-52058</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dave, I think I figured out what I did.  I think it was because I removed the thick grey image border when I was originally customizing the CSS. 

I went into the css color layout I am using (style-talian.css) and bumped out the max-width for both the uncaptioned (img.size-full) and captioned image (.wp-caption) to 100% (they were at varying values, 97.5%, 96%).  Now the images are displaying with normal width.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, I think I figured out what I did.  I think it was because I removed the thick grey image border when I was originally customizing the CSS. </p>
<p>I went into the css color layout I am using (style-talian.css) and bumped out the max-width for both the uncaptioned (img.size-full) and captioned image (.wp-caption) to 100% (they were at varying values, 97.5%, 96%).  Now the images are displaying with normal width.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress SEO Theme Author</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-51963</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress SEO Theme Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 11:14:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-51963</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s a CSS setting called max-width within the Stallion layout CSS files so images never stretch over the sidebars.

Under /stallion-seo-theme/colors/ you&#039;ll find the layout CSS files name format layout-***.css where the *** relates to the layout used, layout-310r.css for example is the 310px wide right sidebar layout (like I use on this site).

Within those files you&#039;ll find this CSS code:

&lt;code&gt;.content_all img {
max-width: 660px;
margin: 0 0 24px 0;
}&lt;/code&gt;

Each file has a different max-width set, the one above is 660px for the right sidebar layout, the double sidebar layouts has it set at 560px and the no sidebars set at 970px. It&#039;s set to take advantage of the entire content area without loading over the sidebars.

If you remove the code entirely the width of the image will determine if it loads over the sidebars or not. I find it looks unprofessional when images load over the sidebars.

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s a CSS setting called max-width within the Stallion layout CSS files so images never stretch over the sidebars.</p>
<p>Under /stallion-seo-theme/colors/ you&#8217;ll find the layout CSS files name format layout-***.css where the *** relates to the layout used, layout-310r.css for example is the 310px wide right sidebar layout (like I use on this site).</p>
<p>Within those files you&#8217;ll find this CSS code:</p>
<p><code>.content_all img {<br />
max-width: 660px;<br />
margin: 0 0 24px 0;<br />
}</code></p>
<p>Each file has a different max-width set, the one above is 660px for the right sidebar layout, the double sidebar layouts has it set at 560px and the no sidebars set at 970px. It&#8217;s set to take advantage of the entire content area without loading over the sidebars.</p>
<p>If you remove the code entirely the width of the image will determine if it loads over the sidebars or not. I find it looks unprofessional when images load over the sidebars.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-51962</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 10:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-51962</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave, just a quick question on images.  I have noticed recently that when I upload a 540px image, the display width is inevitably crunched (for instance, down to 530 or even 506 pixels in a couple of recent posts).  The image itself is not affected (it stays at 540px width), just how it is displayed on the published post.  

I just started noticing this having recently upgraded to the most current edition of Stallion.  This has also retroactively affected old posts and uploads. 

I am wondering if there is any property in the latest edition that may be causing this, or perhaps it is coincidental, and external to anything with the theme?  Have been searching online for similar issues but having trouble finding anything in the general Wordpress ecosystem.  

Thanks,

Erik]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, just a quick question on images.  I have noticed recently that when I upload a 540px image, the display width is inevitably crunched (for instance, down to 530 or even 506 pixels in a couple of recent posts).  The image itself is not affected (it stays at 540px width), just how it is displayed on the published post.  </p>
<p>I just started noticing this having recently upgraded to the most current edition of Stallion.  This has also retroactively affected old posts and uploads. </p>
<p>I am wondering if there is any property in the latest edition that may be causing this, or perhaps it is coincidental, and external to anything with the theme?  Have been searching online for similar issues but having trouble finding anything in the general WordPress ecosystem.  </p>
<p>Thanks,</p>
<p>Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-46706</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 11:38:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-46706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks Dave, yes that is a good point and something to consider.  Seeing an excerpt may encourage click throughs to the comment itself.  Good to know the XX version is SEO&#039;ed in the same manner as the latest.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Dave, yes that is a good point and something to consider.  Seeing an excerpt may encourage click throughs to the comment itself.  Good to know the XX version is SEO&#8217;ed in the same manner as the latest.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress SEO Theme Author</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-46622</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress SEO Theme Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-46622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[SEO wise there&#039;s not a great deal of difference between the Stallion SEO Recent Comments widget and the XX Stallion Recent Comments 12 widget. They are both SEO&#039;d, unlike other WordPress recent comment widgets that add a link to the comment authors website with a nofollow link that deletes link benefit! 

The new version (Stallion SEO Recent Comments widget) has more options, the gravatar and description, but the link part are identical, a text link to the comment only (no author link, no wasted link benefit).

The gravatar is loaded as a background image using CSS which SEO wise is neutral (invisible to Google), so having a gravtar/not having a gravatar with those two widgets is identical SEO wise. The description can be argued both good and bad SEO wise, depends on the site really, I use it for usability, users seem to like the comment links with description more than just the link, presumably as it gives an indication of what the comment is about so morelikely to be clicked on.

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SEO wise there&#8217;s not a great deal of difference between the Stallion SEO Recent Comments widget and the XX Stallion Recent Comments 12 widget. They are both SEO&#8217;d, unlike other WordPress recent comment widgets that add a link to the comment authors website with a nofollow link that deletes link benefit! </p>
<p>The new version (Stallion SEO Recent Comments widget) has more options, the gravatar and description, but the link part are identical, a text link to the comment only (no author link, no wasted link benefit).</p>
<p>The gravatar is loaded as a background image using CSS which SEO wise is neutral (invisible to Google), so having a gravtar/not having a gravatar with those two widgets is identical SEO wise. The description can be argued both good and bad SEO wise, depends on the site really, I use it for usability, users seem to like the comment links with description more than just the link, presumably as it gives an indication of what the comment is about so morelikely to be clicked on.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erik</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-46577</link>
		<dc:creator>Erik</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Mar 2013 14:24:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-46577</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi Dave, one question for you on the &quot;Stallion SEO Recent Comments&quot; widget.  Til now I have been using the previous &quot;XX Stallion Recent Comments 12&quot; widget.  

My question is, would using the newer &quot;Stallion SEO&quot; widget give additional SEO benefit, in terms of not wasting link benefit on those comment links?  Or does the old &quot;XX Stallion&quot; comments widget do the same, in terms of preserving link benefit?

If it does not do so, I&#039;d like to switch to the &quot;Stallion SEO&quot; comments widget.  However I was wondering if there was a way to use it without showing comment excerpts or gravatars (I don&#039;t see any explicit feature in the widget for turning these off).  

My reasoning is that I like these recent comment links in a tight compact box (with the excerpts &amp; gravatars, it takes up a lot of sidebar real estate). 

However if there is no SEO/link benefit difference between these two, I suppose I&#039;d just stay with the &quot;XX&quot; widget.

Thanks much!

Erik]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave, one question for you on the &#8220;Stallion SEO Recent Comments&#8221; widget.  Til now I have been using the previous &#8220;XX Stallion Recent Comments 12&#8243; widget.  </p>
<p>My question is, would using the newer &#8220;Stallion SEO&#8221; widget give additional SEO benefit, in terms of not wasting link benefit on those comment links?  Or does the old &#8220;XX Stallion&#8221; comments widget do the same, in terms of preserving link benefit?</p>
<p>If it does not do so, I&#8217;d like to switch to the &#8220;Stallion SEO&#8221; comments widget.  However I was wondering if there was a way to use it without showing comment excerpts or gravatars (I don&#8217;t see any explicit feature in the widget for turning these off).  </p>
<p>My reasoning is that I like these recent comment links in a tight compact box (with the excerpts &amp; gravatars, it takes up a lot of sidebar real estate). </p>
<p>However if there is no SEO/link benefit difference between these two, I suppose I&#8217;d just stay with the &#8220;XX&#8221; widget.</p>
<p>Thanks much!</p>
<p>Erik</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress SEO Theme Author</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-32519</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress SEO Theme Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 10:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-32519</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a WordPress theme so only works with WordPress.

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a WordPress theme so only works with WordPress.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratanak</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-32517</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratanak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2012 09:52:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-32517</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Hi, David

In fact, I have never used Joomla before for blogging. But right now, I just received my other domain and I designed it with Joomla. Of course, it&#039;s tough to do it. I really wonder if I can use your theme with Joomla or not.

Thank you]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, David</p>
<p>In fact, I have never used Joomla before for blogging. But right now, I just received my other domain and I designed it with Joomla. Of course, it&#8217;s tough to do it. I really wonder if I can use your theme with Joomla or not.</p>
<p>Thank you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ratanak</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-31392</link>
		<dc:creator>Ratanak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2012 06:18:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-31392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you so much. In fact, if I deactivate the post teaser plugin, your theme has deducted already the paragraph for being easy to read.

Again, thank you so much.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you so much. In fact, if I deactivate the post teaser plugin, your theme has deducted already the paragraph for being easy to read.</p>
<p>Again, thank you so much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WordPress SEO Theme Author</title>
		<link>http://www.stallion-theme.com/stallion-wordpress-theme-layoutdesign-options/comment-page-4#comment-31355</link>
		<dc:creator>WordPress SEO Theme Author</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2012 13:08:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.stallion-theme.com/?p=24#comment-31355</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If I recall correctly the post teaser plugin breaks the content at a paragraph level, so won&#039;t go smaller than one paragraph. Also means if you wrote a 10,000 word post with no line breaks it wouldn&#039;t break the content at all.

I don&#039;t use the post teaser plugin anymore (still a good plugin) because I use the Stallion thumbnail feature and the post teaser and Stallion thumbnail features don&#039;t work well together when posts have images high in the content.

David]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I recall correctly the post teaser plugin breaks the content at a paragraph level, so won&#8217;t go smaller than one paragraph. Also means if you wrote a 10,000 word post with no line breaks it wouldn&#8217;t break the content at all.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t use the post teaser plugin anymore (still a good plugin) because I use the Stallion thumbnail feature and the post teaser and Stallion thumbnail features don&#8217;t work well together when posts have images high in the content.</p>
<p>David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
